next up previous contents index
Next: Incidence Geometry Up: Neutral and Non-Euclidean Geometries Previous: Proof Creativity

Euclid's Mathematical System

We will accept the Rules of Reasoning that we have been discussing as our logic rules in our mathematical system. There are several ways in which we can go about setting forth our axioms and undefined terms for geometry. We can keep the number of axioms down to a very few, in which case we need a large number of undefined terms, relations, and operations. We can keep the number of undefined terms, relations, and operations to a small number, thus requiring a larger number of axioms. We will actually work with the Axiom system set up by David Hilbert in 1899 in his book Foundations of Geometry. He not only clarified Euclid's definitions but also filled in the gaps in some of Euclid's proofs. Hilbert recognized that Euclid's proof for the side-angle-side criterion of congruence in triangles was based on an unstated assumption (the principle of superposition) and that this criterion had to be treated as an axiom. He built on the earlier work of Moritz Pasch, who in 1882 published the first rigorous treatise on geometry; Pasch made explicit Euclid's unstated assumptions about betweenness. At the same time we could have used the axioms set forth by Garret Birkhoff. These axioms are the ones with which you are more familiar, being the basis for the texts in High School Geometry. I have included both sets of axioms, so that you can compare the two. We will work exclusively with the Hilbert axioms. An interesting exercise is to prove everything that we will prove using Birkhoff's axioms. Some proofs are easier, and some are harder.

First, let us set our undefined terms. They will be

These objects are to be taken as undefined terms. We will not attempt to make a definition of any of them. However, when we wish to look at a specific example of our geometry, called a model, we will have to establish how each of these undefined terms is to be interpreted. For example, if we wish to look at the model where points are ordered pairs coming from the usual Cartesian plane and lines are the usual straight lines in the Cartesian plane, then we would be able to easily state what it means for a point to be incident with a particular line, what it means for one point to lie between two other points and what it means for two line segments to be congruent. We could change our example though to be a set of seven points, where lines would be ordered pairs of points, incidence would be set inclusion and betweenness and congruence would be meaningless. The particular model that we choose will determine our interpretation of the terms, but will not define them.

At this point we need to make some definitions. In order to do this we need our axiom system. I shall include all of the axioms here, though we will discuss them in more detail later.

Hilbert's Axioms for Neutral Geometry

GROUP I: INCIDENCE AXIOMS 
I-1:
For every point P and for every point Q not equal to P there exists a unique line tex2html_wrap_inline11154 that passes through P and Q.
I-2:
For every line tex2html_wrap_inline11154 there exist at least two distinct points incident with tex2html_wrap_inline11154.
I-3:
There exist three distinct points with the property that no line is incident with all three of them.

GROUP II: BETWEENESS AXIOMS 
B-1:
If tex2html_wrap_inline12498, then A, B, and C are three distinct points all lying on the same line, and tex2html_wrap_inline12506.
B-2:
Given any two distinct points B and D, there exist points A, C, and E lying on tex2html_wrap_inline12518 such that tex2html_wrap_inline12520, tex2html_wrap_inline12522, and tex2html_wrap_inline12524.
B-3:
If A, B, and C are three distinct points lying on the same line, then one and only one of the points is between the other two.
B-4:
(PLANE SEPARATION AXIOM) For every line tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and for any three points A, B, and C not lying on tex2html_wrap_inline11154:
(i)
if A and B are on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and B and C are on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline11154, then A and C are on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline11154.
(ii)
if A and B are on opposite sides of tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and B and C are on opposite sides of tex2html_wrap_inline11154, then A and C are on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline11154.

GROUP III: CONGRUENCE AXIOMS 
C-1:
If A and B are distinct points and if A' is any point, then for each ray r emanating from A' there is a unique point B' on r such that tex2html_wrap_inline12588 and tex2html_wrap_inline12590.
C-2:
If tex2html_wrap_inline12592 and tex2html_wrap_inline12594, then tex2html_wrap_inline12596. Moreover, every segment is congruent to itself.
C-3:
If tex2html_wrap_inline12498, A'*B'*C', tex2html_wrap_inline12590, and tex2html_wrap_inline12608, then tex2html_wrap_inline12610.
C-4:
Given any tex2html_wrap_inline12612 and given any ray tex2html_wrap_inline12614 emanating from a point A', then there is a unique ray tex2html_wrap_inline12618 on a given side of line tex2html_wrap_inline12620 such that tex2html_wrap_inline12622.
C-5:
If tex2html_wrap_inline12624 and tex2html_wrap_inline12626, then tex2html_wrap_inline12628. Moreover, every angle is congruent to itself.
C-6:
(SAS) If two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent respectively to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.

GROUP IV: CONTINUITY AXIOMS 
ARCHIMEDES' AXIOM:
If AB and CD are any segments, then there is a number n such that if segment CD is laid off n times on the ray tex2html_wrap_inline12640 emanating from A, then a point E is reached where tex2html_wrap_inline12646.  
DEDEKIND'S AXIOM:
Suppose that the set of all points on a line tex2html_wrap_inline11154 is the union tex2html_wrap_inline12650 of two nonempty subsets such that no point of tex2html_wrap_inline12652 is between two points of tex2html_wrap_inline12654 and vice versa. Then there is a unique point, O, lying on tex2html_wrap_inline11154 such that tex2html_wrap_inline12660 if and only if tex2html_wrap_inline12662. 

(The following two Principles follow from Dedekind's Axiom, yet are at times more useful.)
CIRCULAR CONTINUITY PRINCIPLE:
If a circle tex2html_wrap_inline11276 has one point inside and one point outside another circle tex2html_wrap_inline12666, then the two circles intersect in two points. 
ELEMENTARY CONTINUITY PRINCIPLE:
If one endpoint of a segment is inside a circle and the other outside the circle, then the segment intersects the circle. 

Birkhoff's Axioms for Neutral Geometry

The setting for these axioms is the Absolute (or Neutral) Plane. It is universal in the sense that all points belong to this plane. It is denoted by tex2html_wrap_inline12668.
AXIOM 1:
There exist nonempty subsets of tex2html_wrap_inline12668 called lines, with the property that each two points belong to exactly one line.
AXIOM 2:
Corresponding to any two points tex2html_wrap_inline12672 there exists a unique number tex2html_wrap_inline12674, the distance from A to B, which is 0 if and only if A = B.
AXIOM 3:
(Birkhoff Ruler Axiom) If k is a line and R denotes the set of real numbers, there exists a one-to-one correspondence (tex2html_wrap_inline12682) between the points tex2html_wrap_inline12684 and the numbers tex2html_wrap_inline12686 such that
displaymath12470
where tex2html_wrap_inline12688.
AXIOM 4:
For each line k there are exactly two nonempty convex sets tex2html_wrap_inline12690 satisfying
i)
tex2html_wrap_inline12692
ii)
tex2html_wrap_inline12694. That is, they are pairwise disjoint.
iii)
If tex2html_wrap_inline12696 then tex2html_wrap_inline12698.

AXIOM 5:
To each angle tex2html_wrap_inline12700 there exists a unique real number x with tex2html_wrap_inline12704 which is the (degree) measure of the angle
displaymath12471
AXIOM 6:
If tex2html_wrap_inline12706, then
displaymath12472
AXIOM 7:
If tex2html_wrap_inline12640 is a ray in the edge, k, of an open half plane H(k;P) then there exist a one-to-one correspondence between the open rays in H(k;P) emanating from A and the set of real numbers between 0 and 180 so that if tex2html_wrap_inline12718 then
displaymath12473
AXIOM 8:
(SAS) If a correspondence of two triangles, or a triangle with itself, is such that two sides and the angle between them are respectively congruent to the corresponding two sides and the angle between them, the correspondence is a congruence of triangles.

Definition: The plane  is the collection of all points and lines.

Definition: The segment
displaymath12474
A and B are the endpoints of the segment AB.  

Definition: Given points O and A in the plane. The set of points P such that tex2html_wrap_inline12738 is a circle  with center O. Each segment OP is called a radius .

Definition: The ray 
displaymath12475
tex2html_wrap_inline12640 emanates  from A and is part of tex2html_wrap_inline12754.

Definition: The rays tex2html_wrap_inline12640 and tex2html_wrap_inline12758 are opposite if they are distinct, emanate from A, and are part of the same line tex2html_wrap_inline12762. 

Definition: An angle  with vertex  A is a point A together with 2 non-opposite rays tex2html_wrap_inline12640 and tex2html_wrap_inline12758, called the sides , emanating from A. Denote this angle by tex2html_wrap_inline12774.

Definition: If tex2html_wrap_inline12776 and tex2html_wrap_inline12778 have a common side tex2html_wrap_inline12780 and the other two sides tex2html_wrap_inline12640 and tex2html_wrap_inline12758 form opposite rays, the angles are supplements or supplementary angles  .

Definition: An angle tex2html_wrap_inline12776 is a right angle   if it has a supplementary angle to which it is congruent.

Definition: Two lines tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and m are parallel  if they do not intersect; i.e., if no point lies on both of them. Denote this by tex2html_wrap_inline12792.

Definition: Two lines tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and m are perpendicular   , tex2html_wrap_inline12798, if they have a point A in common and there exist rays tex2html_wrap_inline12640, a part of tex2html_wrap_inline11154, and tex2html_wrap_inline12758, a part of m, such that tex2html_wrap_inline12612 is a right angle.


next up previous contents index
Next: Incidence Geometry Up: Neutral and Non-Euclidean Geometries Previous: Proof Creativity

david.royster@uky.edu