|
|
Representability |
|
|
|
||
|
We say that a matroid M is representable over a field F if there is some vector space V over F, with some finite set E of vectors of V, so that M is isomorphic to the vectorial matroid of the set E. (Thus we can think of M as just consisting of a bunch of vectors in some vector space over the field F.) We call a matroid that is representable over GF(2) "binary", and over GF(3) "ternary". It is of tremendous interest and import to classify, for a given matroid M, all the fields over which M is representable, and conversely to see if it's possible to characterize all the matroids that are representable over a given field F. Here are some amazingly impressive and important results for representability: 1. A matroid is GF(2)-representable iff it has no U(2, 4)-minor. This sort of theorem, listing all the forbidden minors associated with a specific field, is called an excluded minor characterization. When I first wrote this page in 1996, there was no other field for which an excluded minor characterization was known. As of this writing, however -- in the summer of 1998 -- an excluded minor characterization for GF(4) has been discovered by Geelen, Gerards and Kapoor. Yet still, it is not yet known whether any other field even has a finite list of excluded minors! Next, I give the following theorem, which was discovered by Tutte in 1965: 3. A matroid is representable over every field iff it is representable over GF(2) and over some field of characteristic other than two. A matroid as in this third theorem is called regular (for reasons other than I give here), and it has a vast amount of importance in many areas of mathematics. I won't delve further here. A few years ago, a fine mathematician from New Zealand named Geoff Whittle came up with some amazing results that paralleled Tutte's result, characterizing matroids that are representable over GF(3) and some other field. It's his work that is inspiring me in my own work. More on Whittle's results later. |
||
|
|
||