is not
of content 0 if
for
.
Suppose
for
are closed rectangles which form a cover
for
. By replacing the
with
, one can assume that
for all
. Let
.
Choose a partition
which refines all of the
partitions
where
Note that
is a rectangle of the cover
. Let
be any rectangle
in
with non-empty interior. Since the intersection of any two rectangles
of a partition is contained in their boundaries, if
contains an interior
point
not in
for some
, then
contains only boundary points
of
. So, if
has non-empty interior, then
is a subset of
for some
since the union of the
is
. The sum of the volumes of
the rectangles of
is the volume of
, which is at most equal to the
sum of the volumes of the
. So
is not of content 0 as it cannot
be covered with rectangles of total area less than the volume of
.
cannot have content 0.
Suppose
where
are rectangles, say
. Let
where
and
. Then
contains all the
and hence also
. But then
is bounded, contrary to hypothesis.
The set of natural numbers is unbounded, and hence not of content 0 by part (a).
On the other hand, it is of measure zero. Indeed, if
, then
the union of the open intervals
for
. contains all the natural numbers and the total volume
of all the intervals is
.
also has
content 0.
Suppose a finite set of open rectangles
,
. cover of
and have total volume
less than
where
.
Let
where
. Then the union of the
cover the boundary of
and have total volume less than
.
So the boundary of
is also of content 0.
of measure 0 such that the
boundry of
does not have measure 0.
The set of rational numbers in the interval
is of measure 0 (cf Proof
of Problem 3-9 (b)), but
its boundary
is not of measure 0 (by Theorem 3-6 and Problem 3-8).
be the set of Problem 1-18. If
, show that the boundary of
does not have measure 0.
The set
closed and bounded, and hence compact. If it were also
of measure 0, then it would be of content 0 by Theorem 3-6. But then there
is a finite collection of open intervals which cover the set and have total
volume less than
. Since the set these open intervals together with the
set of
form an open cover of [0, 1], there is a finite subcover
of
. But then the sum of the lengths of the intervals in this
finite subcover would be less than 1, contrary to Theorem 3-5.
be an increasing function. Show
that
is a set of measure 0.
Using the hint, we know by Problem 1-30 that the set of
where
if finite for every
. Hence the set of discontinuities of
is
a countable union of finite sets, and hence has measure 0 by Theorem 3-4.
where each
and each
are
rational can be arranged into a sequence (i.e. form a countable set).
Since the set of rational numbers is countable, and cartesian products of
countable sets are countable, so is the set of all
-tuples of rational
numbers. Since the set of these intervals is just a subset of this set,
it must be countable too.
is any set and
is an open cover
of
, show that there is a sequence
of members of
which also cover
.
Following the hint, for each
in
, there is a rectangle B of the type
in part (a) such that
has non-zero volume, contains
and is contained
in some
in
. In fact, we can even assume that
is in the
interior of the rectangle
. In particular, the union of the interiors of
the rectangles
(where
is allowed to range throughout
) is a cover
of
. By part (a), the set of these
are countable, and hence so are
the set of corresponding
's; this set of corresponding
's cover
.