is an
-dimensional manifold (or manifold-with-boundary)
in
, with the usual orientation, show that
,
as defined in this section, is the same as
, as defined in Chapter 3.
We can assume in the situation of Chapter 3 that
has the usual
orientation. The singular
-cubes with
can be taken
to be linear maps
where
and
are scalar constants.
One has with
, that
. So, the two integrals give the
same value.
is not required to be compact.
For example, if we let
be the open interval
, one has
but
. One can also let
and
.
provided that
vanishes outside of a compact subset of
.
The compactness was used to guarantee that the sums in the proof were finite;
it also works under this assumption because all but finitely many
summands are zero if
vanishes outside of a compact subset of
.
is a
-form on a compact
-dimensional
manifold
, prove that
. Give a counter-example
if
is not compact.
One has
as
is
empty. With
the set of positive real numbers, one has with
that
.
-tensor on
is a function
of the form
for
.
An absolute
-form on
is a function
such that
is an absolute
-tensor on
. Show that
can be
defined, even if
is not orientable.
Make the definition the same as done in the section, except don't require
the manifold be orientable, nor that the singular
-cubes be orientation
preserving. In order for this to work, we need to have the argument of
Theorem 5-4 work, and there the crucial step was to replace
with its absolute value so that Theorem 3-13 could be applied. In our case,
this is automatic because Theorem 4-9 gives
.
is an
-dimensional manifold-with-boundary
and
is an
-dimensional manifold with
boundary, and
are compact, prove that
where
is an
-form on
, and
and
have the orientations induced by the usual orieentations of
and
.
Following the hint, let
. Then
is an
-dimensional manifold-with-boundary and its boundary is the union of
and
. Because the outward directed normals
at points of
are in opposite directions for
and
,
the orientation of
are opposite in the two cases. By Stokes'
Theorem, we have
. So the result is equivalent
to
. So, the result, as stated, is not correct; but,
for example, it would be true if
were closed.